Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Darline Rowe's avatar

I wish I had as much faith in Tillis's vote last night. I believe he did hear us but his vote was not because of his great concern for medicaid recipients but because he fears losing his seat in the Senate. He had to have known Trump would primary him for his no vote, but strategically he thinks it will be easier to win a primary that to win a general if he votes in favor of the bill. He still has time to cave and vote for the final bill. Keep up the pressure 💪!

Expand full comment
mindyoshrainmd's avatar

It’s a bit more complicated. Tills is a no because we called, but mostly because he wants to be re-elected. So it’s both/and. AND… I bet Thune counted votes and told Tillis his no was okay, in order to try to try to save the Senate seat in 2026. Also…“Tillis on Saturday announced that he was voting no on the Senate bill, because of its effects on his state. But while Tillis and a handful of other Republican lawmakers have made a lot of noise about Medicaid cuts going too far, they’ve also signaled they’re willing to live with cuts nearly as big, still on the order of hundreds of billions of dollars.”—from article below. Remember, Tillis was in the NCGA and responsible for denying Medicaid expansion when the ACA passed, denying healthcare to 650K in NC for TEN YEARS.

https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.thebulwark.com%2Fp%2Fmedicaid-cuts-republicans-severing-lifeline-north-carolina%3Futm_campaign%3Demail-half-post%26r%3Ds909%26utm_source%3Dsubstack%26utm_medium%3Demail&data=05%7C02%7Cmoshrain%40duke.edu%7Ce2df770a6feb402c55fc08ddb70a52fe%7Ccb72c54e4a314d9eb14a1ea36dfac94c%7C0%7C0%7C638867977165972058%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=XeyBCTR8C9qZ9MK7aLstJVkWC3hVJjESoa5ojhZsaZ8%3D&reserved=0

Expand full comment
2 more comments...

No posts